linux-nfs-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote on 10/26/2013 06:20:12 AM: > I'd rather look bad for not supporting a broken filesystem feature > than have to deal with the abiove mentioned side-effects. Until the > xattr interface is properly documented and standardised so that it > can be exported safely, it should be treated as a unexportable, in > the same way we treat procfs and sysfs. > This sounds more like an NFS server problem than a client side NFS. Can we add support to the client side NFS and let server that think that they can handle XATTR implement it? We should probably start a discussion in the IETF to resolve the issues you see with XATTR at least for NFSv4.3. Marc. > Cheers > Trond-- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html