On Thu, 2013-07-18 at 20:49 +0000, Myklebust, Trond wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-07-18 at 20:41 +0000, Adamson, Dros wrote:
> > Ok, what about SEQUENCE? Same situation, except this time it's actually a v4.1 op.
>
> SEQUENCE is special. I can't see how it is possible to put it in the
> spo_must_enforce category, since it needs to prefix all other
> operations.
> IOW: that would automatically imply that you can only use the machine
> credential for that NFS server.
Apologies for the duplicate, btw. Evolution crashed right in the middle
of the transmission of the first email.
--
Trond Myklebust
Linux NFS client maintainer
NetApp
Trond.Myklebust@xxxxxxxxxx
www.netapp.com
��.n��������+%������w��{.n�����{��w��� jg��� �����ݢj����G���� ���j:+v���w�m������w�������h�����٥
