On Sat, Jul 06, 2013 at 05:00:38PM +0200, Ulrich Gemkow wrote: > Hello, > > answering as the original poster of the problem: > > On Friday 05 July 2013 21:27:49 J. Bruce Fields wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 05, 2013 at 08:27:40AM +0200, Harald Dunkel wrote: > > > Hi Ulrich, > > > > > > On Mon, 4 Feb 2013 21:24:08 +0100 > > > Ulrich Gemkow <ulrich.gemkow@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > please allow a followup of my own on this: > > > > > > > > On Monday 04 February 2013 11:12:03 Ulrich Gemkow wrote: > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > > > we upgraded our fileserver from Linux 3.2 to linux 3.7.6 and now have > > > > > problems when accessing our nfs-mounted user homes from some sun- > > > > > applications (i.e. Adobe Framemaker): > > > > > > > > > > In the applications file open box, no files are displayed. When entering > > > > > the filename by path, the file can be opened. So it seems some kind of > > > > > dir enumeration which is used by the sun applications is broken. > > > > > > > > > > Other programs on the sun like ls work as before and show all files. > > > > > > > > > > We are using NFSv3 (and cannot switch to v4). Our sun is a very old > > > > > machine running Sun Solaris 10. > > > > > > > > When mounting with vers=2 on the sun (using NFSv2) the files > > > > "reappear", so this is a clear regression in NFSv3 between > > > > Linux 3.2 and Linux 3.7. > > > > And the *only* thing you change is the kernel version, not nfs-utils or > > anything else in userspace? > > Yes, only the kernel changed. > > In the time since my original post in February I found the reason > for the problem: > > The problem is caused by the patch "nfsd: vfs_llseek() with 32 > or 64 bit offsets (hashes)". A discussion of regressions caused > by this patch can be found in the thread http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-systems.ext4/37022 > (started by you :-). > > I solved the problem by disabling the 64-bit hash-extension. > I have not checked whether a better solution was found since > then. Ah, OK. > > > Have you considered upgrading your Solaris version? I had tons > > > of problems with NFS on Solaris10u6 and 10u8, including unresponsive > > > mount points, problems with delegations (esp. in the users' .ssh > > > directories and .Xauthority files) and strange "permission > > > denied" error messages for some ACL feature I never configured on > > > the server. > > > > > > NFS in Solaris 10u10 works much better together with Linux. I > > > haven't tried Solaris 11. > > > > > > My servers run Squeeze and the Linux kernel from the squeeze- > > > backports repository (3.2.0-0.bpo.4-amd64). > > > > > > > Maybe this can be fixed. I will be happy to give more info > > > > if someone is interested. > > > > Most interesting would probably be packet captures in both the "good" > > and "bad" cases; so, something like: > > > > tcpdump -s0 -wtmp.pcap > > > > then reproduce the problem, then kill tcpdump and send tmp.pcap. > > > > (And/or take a look at it yourself with "wireshark tmp.pcap", and there > > may be something obvious that jumps out even to a non-expert.) > > > > --b. > > I think this makes the proposed dump obsolete? Yep. --b. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
