Re: Where in the server code is fsinfo rtpref calculated?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 02:42:42PM +0100, James Vanns wrote:
> > fs/nfsd/nfssvc.c:nfsd_get_default_maxblksize() is probably a good
> > starting point.  Its caller, nfsd_create_serv(), calls
> > svc_create_pooled() with the result that's calculated.
> 
> Hmm. If I've read this section of code correctly, it seems to me
> that on most modern NFS servers (using TCP as the transport) the default
> and preferred blocksize negotiated with clients will almost always be
> 1MB - the maximum RPC payload. The nfsd_get_default_maxblksize() function
> seems obsolete for modern 64-bit servers with at least 4G of RAM as it'll
> always prefer this upper bound instead of any value calculated according to
> available RAM.

Well, "obsolete" is an odd way to put it--the code is still expected to
work on smaller machines.

Arguments welcome about the defaults, though I wonder whether it would
be better to be doing this sort of calculation in user space.

> For what it's worth (not sure if I specified this) I'm running kernel 2.6.32.
> 
> Anyway, this file/function appears to set the default *max* blocksize. I haven't 
> read all the related code yet, but does the preferred block size derive 
> from this maximum too?

See:

> > For fsinfo see fs/nfsd/nfs3proc.c:nfsd3_proc_fsinfo, which uses
> > svc_max_payload().

I'm not sure what the history is behind that logic, though.

--b.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Linux Media Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Info]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux