On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 06:27:26PM -0700, Casey Schaufler wrote: > On 4/24/2013 4:05 PM, David Quigley wrote: > > On 04/24/2013 19:03, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > >> On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 06:14:16PM -0400, David Quigley wrote: > >>> On 04/24/2013 18:12, Steve Dickson wrote: > >>> >On 24/04/13 18:02, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > >>> >>n Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 04:17:50PM -0400, Steve Dickson wrote: > >>> >>>> From: David Quigley <dpquigl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >>> >>>> > >>> >>>> There is a time where we need to calculate a context without the > >>> >>>> inode having been created yet. To do this we take the > >>> >>>negative dentry and > >>> >>>> calculate a context based on the process and the parent > >>> >>>directory contexts. > >>> >>How can we get review from security/selinux folks? I can't > >>> >>apply these > >>> >>without.... > >>> >Its my understand they have been reviewed a number times... And > >>> >they have not > >>> >change since I've working on these patches... > >>> > > >>> >steved. > >>> >-- > >>> >To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe > >>> >linux-nfs" in > >>> >the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > >>> >More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > >>> > >>> That is correct. They have been acked in the past and haven't > >>> changed at all since then. > > For the record, I haven't ACKed because I have been unable to > get the NFS labeling to work with Smack. I also note that I > am not NAKing, either, as I have not had the time to determine > what's wrong. I do know that the ideas floated at the time turned > out to not be the problem. Hopefully I'll have time to look > into this sometime. OK, we'll add an: neither-acked-nor-nacked-by: Casey Schaufler <casey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --b. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
