On 04/24/2013 19:03, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 06:14:16PM -0400, David Quigley wrote:
On 04/24/2013 18:12, Steve Dickson wrote:
>On 24/04/13 18:02, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
>>n Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 04:17:50PM -0400, Steve Dickson wrote:
>>>> From: David Quigley <dpquigl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>
>>>> There is a time where we need to calculate a context without
the
>>>> inode having been created yet. To do this we take the
>>>negative dentry and
>>>> calculate a context based on the process and the parent
>>>directory contexts.
>>How can we get review from security/selinux folks? I can't
>>apply these
>>without....
>Its my understand they have been reviewed a number times... And
>they have not
>change since I've working on these patches...
>
>steved.
>--
>To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
>linux-nfs" in
>the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
That is correct. They have been acked in the past and haven't
changed at all since then.
Oh, OK, sorry--I lost track. (Do you have a pointer?)
I may be able to crawl through MARC.info for my old email address to
see if I can find it but that is probably more effort than its worth.
All of those ACKs and what not are saved in my old NSA email (assuming
its still being kept around).
I have contacted Eric Paris about
reviewing them anyway so you can have a more recent ack on the
patches.
But that would be helpful too, thanks.
--b.
I think its a good idea to have Eric look through them anyway just to
be sure.
Dave
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
