Re: [PATCH 13/14] NFSD: Server implementation of MAC Labeling

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 30/03/13 20:02, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 06:49:19PM -0400, Steve Dickson wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 30/03/13 18:08, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
>>> On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 05:50:21PM -0400, Steve Dickson wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 28/03/13 14:58, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 09:54:04AM -0400, Steve Dickson wrote:
>>>>>> From: David Quigley <dpquigl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This patch adds the ability to encode and decode file labels on the server for
>>>>>> the purpose of sending them to the client and also to process label change
>>>>>> requests from the client.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Matthew N. Dodd <Matthew.Dodd@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Miguel Rodel Felipe <Rodel_FM@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Phua Eu Gene <PHUA_Eu_Gene@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Khin Mi Mi Aung <Mi_Mi_AUNG@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>  fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c |  41 +++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>>  fs/nfsd/nfs4xdr.c  | 116 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>>>>>>  fs/nfsd/nfsd.h     |   6 ++-
>>>>>>  fs/nfsd/vfs.c      |  29 ++++++++++++++
>>>>>>  fs/nfsd/vfs.h      |   2 +
>>>>>>  fs/nfsd/xdr4.h     |   3 ++
>>>>>>  6 files changed, 191 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c
>>>>>> index ae73175..bb17589 100644
>>>>>> --- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c
>>>>>> +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c
>>>>>> @@ -42,6 +42,36 @@
>>>>>>  #include "current_stateid.h"
>>>>>>  #include "netns.h"
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_NFSD_V4_SECURITY_LABEL
>>>>>> +#include <linux/security.h>
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +static inline void
>>>>>> +nfsd4_security_inode_setsecctx(struct svc_fh *resfh, struct nfs4_label *label, u32 *bmval)
>>>>>> +{
>>>>>> +	struct inode *inode = resfh->fh_dentry->d_inode;
>>>>>> +	int status;
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +	mutex_lock(&inode->i_mutex);
>>>>>> +	status = security_inode_setsecctx(resfh->fh_dentry,
>>>>>> +		label->label, label->len);
>>>>>> +	mutex_unlock(&inode->i_mutex);
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +	if (status)
>>>>>> +		/*
>>>>>> +		 * We should probably fail the whole open at this point,
>>>>>> +		 * but we've already created or opened the file, so it's 
>>>>>> +		 * too late; So this seems the least of evils:
>>>>>> +		 */
>>>>>> +		bmval[2] &= ~FATTR4_WORD2_SECURITY_LABEL;
>>>>>> +		
>>>>>> +	return;
>>>>>> +}
>>>>>> +#else 
>>>>>> +static inline void 
>>>>>> +nfsd4_security_inode_setsecctx(struct svc_fh *resfh, struct nfs4_label *label, u32 *bmval)
>>>>>> +{ }
>>>>>> +#endif
>>>>>> +
>>>>>>  #define NFSDDBG_FACILITY		NFSDDBG_PROC
>>>>>>  
>>>>>>  static u32 nfsd_attrmask[] = {
>>>>>> @@ -230,6 +260,9 @@ do_open_lookup(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct svc_fh *current_fh, struct nfsd4_o
>>>>>>  					(u32 *)open->op_verf.data,
>>>>>>  					&open->op_truncate, &open->op_created);
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> +		if (!status && open->op_label != NULL) 
>>>>>> +			nfsd4_security_inode_setsecctx(resfh, open->op_label, open->op_bmval);
>>>>>> +
>>>>>>  		/*
>>>>>>  		 * Following rfc 3530 14.2.16, use the returned bitmask
>>>>>>  		 * to indicate which attributes we used to store the
>>>>>> @@ -599,6 +632,9 @@ nfsd4_create(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct nfsd4_compound_state *cstate,
>>>>>>  	if (status)
>>>>>>  		goto out;
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> +	if (create->cr_label != NULL)
>>>>>> +		nfsd4_security_inode_setsecctx(&resfh, create->cr_label, create->cr_bmval);
>>>>>> +
>>>>>>  	if (create->cr_acl != NULL)
>>>>>>  		do_set_nfs4_acl(rqstp, &resfh, create->cr_acl,
>>>>>>  				create->cr_bmval);
>>>>>> @@ -888,6 +924,11 @@ nfsd4_setattr(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct nfsd4_compound_state *cstate,
>>>>>>  					    setattr->sa_acl);
>>>>>>  	if (status)
>>>>>>  		goto out;
>>>>>> +	if (setattr->sa_label != NULL)
>>>>>> +		status = nfsd4_set_nfs4_label(rqstp, &cstate->current_fh,
>>>>>> +				setattr->sa_label);
>>>>>> +	if (status)
>>>>>> +		goto out;
>>>>>>  	status = nfsd_setattr(rqstp, &cstate->current_fh, &setattr->sa_iattr,
>>>>>>  				0, (time_t)0);
>>>>>>  out:
>>>>>> diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4xdr.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4xdr.c
>>>>>> index 0116886..52e219c 100644
>>>>>> --- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4xdr.c
>>>>>> +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4xdr.c
>>>>>> @@ -55,6 +55,11 @@
>>>>>>  #include "cache.h"
>>>>>>  #include "netns.h"
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_NFSD_V4_SECURITY_LABEL
>>>>>> +#include <linux/security.h>
>>>>>> +#endif
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +
>>>>>>  #define NFSDDBG_FACILITY		NFSDDBG_XDR
>>>>>>  
>>>>>>  /*
>>>>>> @@ -79,6 +84,24 @@ check_filename(char *str, int len)
>>>>>>  			return nfserr_badname;
>>>>>>  	return 0;
>>>>>>  } 
>>>>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_NFSD_V4_SECURITY_LABEL
>>>>>> +static struct nfs4_label *nfsd4_label_alloc(u32 len)
>>>>>> +{
>>>>>> +	struct nfs4_label *label = NULL;
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +	if (len > NFS4_MAXLABELLEN)
>>>>>> +		return ERR_PTR(-ENAMETOOLONG);
>>>>>
>>>>> This is returned as NFS4ERR_NAMETOOLONG.
>>>>>
>>>>> The 4.2 spec should note this case, if it's the right error.  rfc 5661
>>>>> says that error's only for filenames, and doesn't allow it for setattr
>>>>> (which doesn't take a filename).
>>>> The 4.2 spec (draft-ietf-nfsv4-minorversion2-19.txt) defines two Labeled 
>>>> NFS errors:
>>>> NFS4ERR_BADLABEL  (Error Code 10093)
>>>> NFS4ERR_WRONG_LFS (Error Code 10092)
>>>>
>>>> and we currently don't define either one of them... So I guess that
>>>> will have to change... 
>>>
>>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-nfsv4-minorversion2-19#section-11.1.3.1
>>> just says "The label specified is invalid in some manner" for
>>> NFS4ERR_BADLABEL.
>>>
>>> Anyway, that sounds like the right one for this case....
>>>
>>>> So what should NFS4ERR_BADLABEL map to in nfserrno()?
>>>
>>> I don't know; I guess I'd check out what errors can be returned from the
>>> code that sets a context.
>> Looking looking at the code under security/selinux, the popular returns 
>> seem to be are
>> -EOPNOTSUPP, -EACCES, -EPERM and -EINVAL. 
>>
>> I say we go with -EINVAL....
> 
> Note nfserrno() converts from -ERR to nfs4 errors.  You may be thinking
> of the client side nfs4_stat_to_errno().
I was looking at nfsd4_decode_fattr()... If nfsd4_label_alloc() does fail,
host_err is set and we jump to out_nfserr:. Then status is then set by the
return value of nfserrno(host_err); I'm thinking that status should be set 
to -EINVAL

steved.




--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Linux Media Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Info]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux