Re: [PATCH 13/14] NFSD: Server implementation of MAC Labeling

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 30/03/13 18:08, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 05:50:21PM -0400, Steve Dickson wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 28/03/13 14:58, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
>>> On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 09:54:04AM -0400, Steve Dickson wrote:
>>>> From: David Quigley <dpquigl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>
>>>> This patch adds the ability to encode and decode file labels on the server for
>>>> the purpose of sending them to the client and also to process label change
>>>> requests from the client.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Matthew N. Dodd <Matthew.Dodd@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Miguel Rodel Felipe <Rodel_FM@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Phua Eu Gene <PHUA_Eu_Gene@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Khin Mi Mi Aung <Mi_Mi_AUNG@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> ---
>>>>  fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c |  41 +++++++++++++++++++
>>>>  fs/nfsd/nfs4xdr.c  | 116 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>>>>  fs/nfsd/nfsd.h     |   6 ++-
>>>>  fs/nfsd/vfs.c      |  29 ++++++++++++++
>>>>  fs/nfsd/vfs.h      |   2 +
>>>>  fs/nfsd/xdr4.h     |   3 ++
>>>>  6 files changed, 191 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c
>>>> index ae73175..bb17589 100644
>>>> --- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c
>>>> +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c
>>>> @@ -42,6 +42,36 @@
>>>>  #include "current_stateid.h"
>>>>  #include "netns.h"
>>>>  
>>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_NFSD_V4_SECURITY_LABEL
>>>> +#include <linux/security.h>
>>>> +
>>>> +static inline void
>>>> +nfsd4_security_inode_setsecctx(struct svc_fh *resfh, struct nfs4_label *label, u32 *bmval)
>>>> +{
>>>> +	struct inode *inode = resfh->fh_dentry->d_inode;
>>>> +	int status;
>>>> +
>>>> +	mutex_lock(&inode->i_mutex);
>>>> +	status = security_inode_setsecctx(resfh->fh_dentry,
>>>> +		label->label, label->len);
>>>> +	mutex_unlock(&inode->i_mutex);
>>>> +
>>>> +	if (status)
>>>> +		/*
>>>> +		 * We should probably fail the whole open at this point,
>>>> +		 * but we've already created or opened the file, so it's 
>>>> +		 * too late; So this seems the least of evils:
>>>> +		 */
>>>> +		bmval[2] &= ~FATTR4_WORD2_SECURITY_LABEL;
>>>> +		
>>>> +	return;
>>>> +}
>>>> +#else 
>>>> +static inline void 
>>>> +nfsd4_security_inode_setsecctx(struct svc_fh *resfh, struct nfs4_label *label, u32 *bmval)
>>>> +{ }
>>>> +#endif
>>>> +
>>>>  #define NFSDDBG_FACILITY		NFSDDBG_PROC
>>>>  
>>>>  static u32 nfsd_attrmask[] = {
>>>> @@ -230,6 +260,9 @@ do_open_lookup(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct svc_fh *current_fh, struct nfsd4_o
>>>>  					(u32 *)open->op_verf.data,
>>>>  					&open->op_truncate, &open->op_created);
>>>>  
>>>> +		if (!status && open->op_label != NULL) 
>>>> +			nfsd4_security_inode_setsecctx(resfh, open->op_label, open->op_bmval);
>>>> +
>>>>  		/*
>>>>  		 * Following rfc 3530 14.2.16, use the returned bitmask
>>>>  		 * to indicate which attributes we used to store the
>>>> @@ -599,6 +632,9 @@ nfsd4_create(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct nfsd4_compound_state *cstate,
>>>>  	if (status)
>>>>  		goto out;
>>>>  
>>>> +	if (create->cr_label != NULL)
>>>> +		nfsd4_security_inode_setsecctx(&resfh, create->cr_label, create->cr_bmval);
>>>> +
>>>>  	if (create->cr_acl != NULL)
>>>>  		do_set_nfs4_acl(rqstp, &resfh, create->cr_acl,
>>>>  				create->cr_bmval);
>>>> @@ -888,6 +924,11 @@ nfsd4_setattr(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct nfsd4_compound_state *cstate,
>>>>  					    setattr->sa_acl);
>>>>  	if (status)
>>>>  		goto out;
>>>> +	if (setattr->sa_label != NULL)
>>>> +		status = nfsd4_set_nfs4_label(rqstp, &cstate->current_fh,
>>>> +				setattr->sa_label);
>>>> +	if (status)
>>>> +		goto out;
>>>>  	status = nfsd_setattr(rqstp, &cstate->current_fh, &setattr->sa_iattr,
>>>>  				0, (time_t)0);
>>>>  out:
>>>> diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4xdr.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4xdr.c
>>>> index 0116886..52e219c 100644
>>>> --- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4xdr.c
>>>> +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4xdr.c
>>>> @@ -55,6 +55,11 @@
>>>>  #include "cache.h"
>>>>  #include "netns.h"
>>>>  
>>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_NFSD_V4_SECURITY_LABEL
>>>> +#include <linux/security.h>
>>>> +#endif
>>>> +
>>>> +
>>>>  #define NFSDDBG_FACILITY		NFSDDBG_XDR
>>>>  
>>>>  /*
>>>> @@ -79,6 +84,24 @@ check_filename(char *str, int len)
>>>>  			return nfserr_badname;
>>>>  	return 0;
>>>>  } 
>>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_NFSD_V4_SECURITY_LABEL
>>>> +static struct nfs4_label *nfsd4_label_alloc(u32 len)
>>>> +{
>>>> +	struct nfs4_label *label = NULL;
>>>> +
>>>> +	if (len > NFS4_MAXLABELLEN)
>>>> +		return ERR_PTR(-ENAMETOOLONG);
>>>
>>> This is returned as NFS4ERR_NAMETOOLONG.
>>>
>>> The 4.2 spec should note this case, if it's the right error.  rfc 5661
>>> says that error's only for filenames, and doesn't allow it for setattr
>>> (which doesn't take a filename).
>> The 4.2 spec (draft-ietf-nfsv4-minorversion2-19.txt) defines two Labeled 
>> NFS errors:
>> NFS4ERR_BADLABEL  (Error Code 10093)
>> NFS4ERR_WRONG_LFS (Error Code 10092)
>>
>> and we currently don't define either one of them... So I guess that
>> will have to change... 
> 
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-nfsv4-minorversion2-19#section-11.1.3.1
> just says "The label specified is invalid in some manner" for
> NFS4ERR_BADLABEL.
> 
> Anyway, that sounds like the right one for this case....
> 
>> So what should NFS4ERR_BADLABEL map to in nfserrno()?
> 
> I don't know; I guess I'd check out what errors can be returned from the
> code that sets a context.
Looking looking at the code under security/selinux, the popular returns 
seem to be are
-EOPNOTSUPP, -EACCES, -EPERM and -EINVAL. 

I say we go with -EINVAL....

steved.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Linux Media Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Info]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux