On Wed, 28 Nov 2012 15:01:26 -0500 "bfields@xxxxxxxxxxxx" <bfields@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > 3) Holding net by tracker looks redundant. What was the reason for this? > > I don't understand, what's tracker? I assume he means the clientid tracker. That was necessary for the nfsdcld upcall because it used rpc_pipefs files, and those were net-namespacified. Once we deprecate that in 3.10, I don't think we'll need to worry about the net namespace in the clientid tracker. We probably *will* need to concern ourselves with the mnt namespace there though since each container will presumably have its own clientid database... -- Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
