16.11.2012 20:58, bfields@xxxxxxxxxxxx пишет:
A patch follows: note it's a two-line patch, with 20 lines of changelog
showing that I looked at what state might be shared by other threads and
explaining why I think this is safe.
Acked-by: Stanislav Kinsburskiy <skinsbursky@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
I think that's what we need to do: little patches that remove it from
one or another part of the code with careful explanation of why it
works.
Yes, thanks. I'll also try to simplify nfsd_open() by little patches.
In general it looks like client_mutex protect two different things: open owner
state (which is containerised already, actually) and files access.
So, probably, this client mutex have to be converted into two: per-net one,
which protects open owner state, and static one, which protects files operations.
What do you think about it?
--
Best regards,
Stanislav Kinsbursky
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
