On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 3:03 AM, Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 10/09/2012 11:44 AM, Boaz Harrosh wrote: >> On 10/07/2012 02:59 PM, Peng Tao wrote: >>> Hi Trond, >>> >>> Following first three patches were sent before and optimize layoutget size. >>> Last patch is cleanup and is also sent before. >>> >>> Sorry that I have to send patches as attachments. I am having problem >>> with my smtp setup. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Tao >>> >> >> Tao hi. >> >> What are these patches based on? they do not apply to Linus tree as of today >> (v3.6-9228-g547b1e8) and they do not apply to v3.6 nor v3.5 tags. >> >> I get a conflict on the first patch: >> NFS: track direct IO left bytes >> > > Actually the second patch does not apply either. minor on pnfs.c but > a real fallout on blocklayout.c (3 and 4 are fine) > Sorry I forgot to mention... They apply to Trond's nfs-for-next branch, commit (5f65753033d8c5a53e65810bff3832e8282c68d1). Thanks, Tao -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
