On 10/09/2012 11:44 AM, Boaz Harrosh wrote: > On 10/07/2012 02:59 PM, Peng Tao wrote: >> Hi Trond, >> >> Following first three patches were sent before and optimize layoutget size. >> Last patch is cleanup and is also sent before. >> >> Sorry that I have to send patches as attachments. I am having problem >> with my smtp setup. >> >> Thanks, >> Tao >> > > Tao hi. > > What are these patches based on? they do not apply to Linus tree as of today > (v3.6-9228-g547b1e8) and they do not apply to v3.6 nor v3.5 tags. > > I get a conflict on the first patch: > NFS: track direct IO left bytes > Actually the second patch does not apply either. minor on pnfs.c but a real fallout on blocklayout.c (3 and 4 are fine) Boaz > (Do you have a public git tree with these on? Why don't you ask for a git tree > on git.linux-nfs.org. Trond who should we ask for an hosting on git.linux-nfs.org) > > Thanks > Boaz > >> Peng Tao (4): >> NFS: track direct IO left bytes >> NFS41: send real write size in layoutget >> NFS41: send real read size in layoutget >> pnfsblock: cleanup nfs4_blkdev_get >> >> fs/nfs/blocklayout/blocklayout.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- >> fs/nfs/blocklayout/blocklayout.h | 1 - >> fs/nfs/blocklayout/blocklayoutdev.c | 25 ++++------------------ >> fs/nfs/direct.c | 12 +++++++++++ >> fs/nfs/internal.h | 1 + >> fs/nfs/objlayout/objio_osd.c | 9 +++++++- >> fs/nfs/pnfs.c | 16 ++++++++++++-- >> fs/nfs/pnfs.h | 3 +- >> 8 files changed, 76 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-) >> > > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
