On Sun, 2012-09-23 at 20:41 -0400, Jeff Layton wrote: > Wait though -- is it not safe to assume that a zero length filehandle > is invalid? > > Neil's earlier patch checked for entry->fh.size == 0, would it not be > reasonable to warn once per server when we get back such a fh? The point is that sanity checking of filehandles by the client is a totally _insane_ concept. Yes we can do it for a couple of corner cases. No, we sure as hell do NOT want to get stuck doing it for the general case. Trond -- Trond Myklebust Linux NFS client maintainer NetApp Trond.Myklebust@xxxxxxxxxx www.netapp.com ��.n��������+%������w��{.n�����{��w���jg��������ݢj����G�������j:+v���w�m������w�������h�����٥