Myklebust, Trond wrote: > Well, it's mapping it to "nobody" id 99: Yes, that's the correct thing to do if a user "nobody" exists. Is it? RFC3530 says "nobody" (on the wire) is the anonymous user. If the server has a real user whose local name is "nobody," should the nfs anonymous user be mapped to the real local user named "nobody", or should it be mapped to uid -2? I'm inclined to say that if you have a real user named "nobody" on linux then you get what you deserve. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
