On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 07:19:29PM +0400, Stanislav Kinsbursky wrote: > Just a reminder: abstract (is it the right name?) UNIX sockets (with > '\0' as a first character in name) are containerized already. > If UNIX socket is the only way. then maybe this "abstract" socket can be used? Huh. Reading the section on abstract addresses in unix(7).... Maybe that would work. I don't quite understand the namespace. If we fix a name for gss-proxy to use, what's to prevent somebody else from binding to the same name and preventing us from using it? --b. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
