On 22.05.2012 17:00, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Tue, 2012-05-22 at 08:47 -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
Have you and Stanislav talked about fitting this with the ongoing
container work?
No, I wanted to make it work for the normal case first, I assume it will
be simple enough to change the code to work with containers later.
Main reason is that I have no way to test containerized stuff.
It's not that hard to "containerize" this code.
All you need is to bypass rqstp->rq_xprt->xpt_net to gssp_rpc_create().
I.e. either add net as a parameter to
gssp_accept_sec_context_upcall()->gssp_call()->get_clnt()->gssp_rpc_create()
prototypes or pass it as a part of gssp_upcall_data structure and then pass as a
parameter to gssp_call()->get_clnt()->gssp_rpc_create().
This will suits you. I.e. I'm sure that you'll not experience any changes
comparing to current behavior.
If I understand it correctly, all is needed is to allow attaching to
different sockets for different containers ?
Sorry, but I don't understand the sentence.
Starting from kernel 3.3 SUNRPC layer if fully containerized. I.e. all network
related resources now carefully allocated and destroyed per and with network
namespace.
And it would be really great, if the layer will remain containerized in future.
Simo.
--
Best regards,
Stanislav Kinsbursky
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
