Re: [PATCH 3/4] SUNRPC: Add RPC based upcall mechanism for RPCGSS auth

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 11:16:21AM -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-05-22 at 11:07 -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> > On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 06:44:55PM +0400, Stanislav Kinsbursky wrote:
> > > Yep, we discussed it already.
> > > The problem is that connect call to unix sockets is done from rpciod
> > > workqueue because of selinux restrictions.
> > > IOW UNIX socket path will be traversed staring from rpciod kernel
> > > thread root. Currently this problem is existent for portmapper
> > > registration calls - for example LockD, started in container with
> > > nested root, will be registered in global rpcbind instead of local
> > > (container's) one.
> > 
> > Thanks for the reminder!
> > 
> > > One of solutions was to export set_fs_root(), but Al Viro doesn't like it.
> > > 
> > > So currently I'm thinking about patching network layer - i.e.
> > > implementing an ability to pass desired path to unix sockets connect
> > > and bind calls.
> > > IOW, I'm talking about introducing of "bindat" and "connectat" system calls...
> > 
> > So then we'd resolve the path in the right context and pass down a
> > (vfsmount, dentry) that rpciod could use in bindat/connectat calls?
> > 
> > > >In particular: the current svcgssd communication method is using one of
> > > >the sunrpc caches.  If we convert now to this method (which uses a unix
> > > >socket) would there be a loss in functionality, until the unix sockets
> > > >problems are fixed?
> > > >
> > > 
> > > I'm afraid, that you are right...
> > > This new client will connect to root daemon - not containerized one...
> > > How soon this new unix-socket way will become common practice?
> > > Maybe I'd be able to patch unix sockets before distro's will use this new version.
> > > But I don't know, what would be best to do...
> > 
> > Ugh.
> > 
> > Simo, remind me of the reasons for using a unix socket?
> 
> It's an RPC protocol, and we do not want the size limitations of other
> upcall mechanisms, we really want a stream.

So what ruled out TCP over lo?

--b.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Linux Media Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Info]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux