Should this go in via the NFS tree? I can put it into the security tree otherwise. On Tue, 7 Feb 2012, Steve Dickson wrote: > To take advantage of the "Allow special keyrings to be > cleared" keyring patch the NFS keyring has to be writeable. > > Signed-off-by: Steve Dickson <steved@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > fs/nfs/idmap.c | 2 +- > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/nfs/idmap.c b/fs/nfs/idmap.c > index a1bbf77..1d88cdb 100644 > --- a/fs/nfs/idmap.c > +++ b/fs/nfs/idmap.c > @@ -269,7 +269,7 @@ static ssize_t nfs_idmap_request_key(const char *name, size_t namelen, > } > > rcu_read_lock(); > - rkey->perm |= KEY_USR_VIEW; > + rkey->perm |= KEY_USR_VIEW|KEY_USR_WRITE; > > ret = key_validate(rkey); > if (ret < 0) > -- > 1.7.7.5 > -- James Morris <jmorris@xxxxxxxxx> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
