Stanislav Kinsbursky <skinsbursky@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > 19.12.2011 20:37, Eric W. Biederman пишет: >> Stanislav Kinsbursky<skinsbursky@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> >> Doing that independently of the rest of the sysctls is pretty horrible >> and confusing to users. What I am planning might suit your needs and >> if not we need to talk some more about how to get the vfs to do >> something reasonable. >> > > Ok, Eric. Would be glad to discuss your sysctls plans. > But actually you already know my needs: I would like to make sysctls work in the > way like sysfs does: i.e. content of files depends on mount maker - > not viewer. What drives the desire to have sysctls depend on the mount maker? Especially what drives that desire not to have it have a /proc/<pid>/sys directory that reflects the sysctls for a given process. Eric -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
