On 11/02, Jeff Layton wrote: > > On Tue, 1 Nov 2011 14:57:10 -0700 > Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > For now, let's go with the count/dont_count. Can you please write up > > a patch for that? Jeff, does this seem okay to you? > > > > Let me make sure I understand since I don't have a great grasp of the > freezer internals... > > This will set the PF_FREEZER_SKIP flag on the task, which prevents > try_to_freeze_tasks from incrementing the "todo" var for this process > and should let the suspend proceed. > > So this really makes try_to_freeze_tasks set PF_FREEZING on the task, > but not get upset that it doesn't actually call try_to_freeze(). Yes. PF_FREEZER_SKIP means, "please count me as frozen". This task can do nothing except refrigerator() after wakeup. > Is that sufficient for a process that's just sleeping here? I think this should work... but this is the question to you ;) Oleg. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
