Hey, Oleg. On Tue, Nov 01, 2011 at 08:46:01PM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > On 11/01, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > > > > Or we can add TASK_FREEZABLE (like TASK_WAKEKILL), iirc we already > > discussed this some time ago. And probably it makes sense to add the > > generic wait_event_state(). > > Forgot to mention. I think that before anything else we need > signal_wake_up_state(). For example, note that none of the callers > of signal_wake_up(resume => true) in ptrace code wants to wake up > the killable task. Yeah, agreed for both wait_event_state() and signal_wake_up_state(). For now, let's go with the count/dont_count. Can you please write up a patch for that? Jeff, does this seem okay to you? For TASK_FREEZABLE, I'm not entirely sure. Combined with wait_event_state(), it can definitely reduce the number of different variants of wait_event_*(). Let's see. Thanks. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
