Venkateswararao Jujjuri [jvrao@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] wrote: > >I think we are avoiding volatile file handles as long as possible. We don't have plans to implement them at the moment. > Hrm. How can we achieve the complete migration support without > volatile filehandle support? If you can generate persistent file handles that don't include server specific information (maybe a bit hard, but not impossible), migration can be done. Maybe that is what Chuck is talking about. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html