Sent from my iPhone
On 30/07/2011, at 2:53, "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 12:48:36PM -0400, bfields wrote:
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 11:30:05PM +1000, Greg Banks wrote:
Sent from my iPhone
On 29/07/2011, at 22:11, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Le vendredi 29 juillet 2011 à 21:58 +1000, Greg Banks a écrit :
Sure, and a whole lot of the callsites are ("..._%d", cpu),
hence the
unfortune :(
BTW, we could name nfsd threads differently :
Currently, they all are named : "nfsd"
If SVC_POOL_PERCPU is selected, we could name them :
nfsd_c0 -> nfsd_cN
If SVC_POOL_PERNODE is selected, we could name them :
nfsd_n0 -> nfsd_nN
That would help to check with "ps aux" which cpu/nodes are under
stress.
I like it!
Yup, patch welcomed.--b.
(Annoying fact: some initscripts stop nfsd using a rough equivalent of
"killall nfsd". So the name of the threads is arguably ABI. I think
those initscripts are nuts and deserve what they get, but that may be
because I'm forgetting the reason they do that.)
We had this discussion in May-June 2008; it's because the nfsds were
once many many years ago userspace threads.
The "killall nfsd" semantics in those scripts are awful and lead to
problems shutting down when there are lots of threads. It would
probably be an improvement to provide a better shutdown mechanism and
force distros to use it.
Or, you could preserve the effective semantics by having a single
"nfsd" thread whose purpose is to notice that it's being signalled and
perform a clean shutdown (perhaps blocking the thread doing the kill()
call until the shutdown has completed).
Greg.--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
