On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 11:30:05PM +1000, Greg Banks wrote:
>
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On 29/07/2011, at 22:11, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > Le vendredi 29 juillet 2011 à 21:58 +1000, Greg Banks a écrit :
> >
> >>
> >> Sure, and a whole lot of the callsites are ("..._%d", cpu), hence the
> >> unfortune :(
> >
> > BTW, we could name nfsd threads differently :
> >
> > Currently, they all are named : "nfsd"
> >
> > If SVC_POOL_PERCPU is selected, we could name them :
> > nfsd_c0 -> nfsd_cN
> >
> > If SVC_POOL_PERNODE is selected, we could name them :
> > nfsd_n0 -> nfsd_nN
> >
> > That would help to check with "ps aux" which cpu/nodes are under
> > stress.
> >
> >
>
> I like it!
Yup, patch welcomed.--b.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
