On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 09:14:30AM +0800, Mi Jinlong wrote:
> Make sure nfs server can distinguish client's retry RECLAIM_COMPLETE.
Applying for 2.6.40, thanks.--b.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mi Jinlong <mijinlong@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c | 19 ++++++++++++++-----
> 1 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
> index 43cda94..8d521d8 100644
> --- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
> +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
> @@ -1804,6 +1804,8 @@ out:
> __be32
> nfsd4_reclaim_complete(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct nfsd4_compound_state *cstate, struct nfsd4_reclaim_complete *rc)
> {
> + int status = 0;
> +
> if (rc->rca_one_fs) {
> if (!cstate->current_fh.fh_dentry)
> return nfserr_nofilehandle;
> @@ -1813,9 +1815,14 @@ nfsd4_reclaim_complete(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct nfsd4_compound_state *csta
> */
> return nfs_ok;
> }
> +
> nfs4_lock_state();
> - if (is_client_expired(cstate->session->se_client)) {
> - nfs4_unlock_state();
> + status = nfserr_complete_already;
> + if (cstate->session->se_client->cl_firststate)
> + goto out;
> +
> + status = nfserr_stale_clientid;
> + if (is_client_expired(cstate->session->se_client))
> /*
> * The following error isn't really legal.
> * But we only get here if the client just explicitly
> @@ -1823,11 +1830,13 @@ nfsd4_reclaim_complete(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct nfsd4_compound_state *csta
> * error it gets back on an operation for the dead
> * client.
> */
> - return nfserr_stale_clientid;
> - }
> + goto out;
> +
> + status = nfs_ok;
> nfsd4_create_clid_dir(cstate->session->se_client);
> +out:
> nfs4_unlock_state();
> - return nfs_ok;
> + return status;
> }
>
> __be32
> --
> 1.7.4.1
>
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
