On 04/05/2011 08:20 AM, NeilBrown wrote: > On Mon, 04 Apr 2011 16:14:48 -0400 Bryan Schumaker <bjschuma@xxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > >> I've done some more testing and posted my initial results here: https://wiki.linux-nfs.org/wiki/index.php/Readdir_performance_results. If anybody has suggestions for better ways to organize the data, please let me know. I'll also try to post some graphs in the next couple of days. > > I think graphs would certainly help. > Also it might be good to be explicit about the server hardware/config as that > can make a real performance difference. I've aded this to the readdir performance page. Is there anything else I should put up about the server? > No bright ideas about how to organise the graphs... > I'd probably try just graphing the 'real' time against kernel version > with one line for each different directory size. > > Then you get 16 graphs, 4 different configs (v3/v4 x rddirplus/norddirplus) > and 4 different tests (ls -f, ls -lU, ls -U, rm -r... though I can't see how > "ls -U" is different from "ls -f"). I've added graphs showing real time. I'll be putting up graphs showing sys time and total number of RPC calls throughout the day. > NeilBrown > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
