Re: server does not abort grace period

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ferenc Wagner <wferi@xxxxxxx> writes:

> We're running 2.6.32 (Debian squeeze) NFS4 server and clients.  The
> server boots and runs purely from SAN, so we can start it on different
> computers.  In case of such "hardware failovers" I'd expect the clients
> to quickly reclaim their locks (if any) and thus the server to abort
> it's 90-second grace period early.  However, this does not happen,
> ruining our HA like, totally.
>
> So, the questions: is the functionality of aborting the grace period
> early missing from version 2.6.32 of the Linux kernel?  If yes, is it
> present in any kernel version?  If it should work, could someone offer
> some advice on debugging it?  If it isn't supported, what's the
> best practice of providing highly available NFSv4 today?

Hi,

Could somebody please share any related wisdom?  Pretty please?
In short, how to fight grace period in a HA NFS4 setup?
Decreasing it (of course after cutting the lock lease time) seems a
rather big hammer, I'd like to avoid using it if reasonably possible.
-- 
Thanks,
Feri.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Linux Media Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Info]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux