On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 02:28:28PM -0500, Jeff Layton wrote: > On Fri, 18 Feb 2011 09:11:54 -0800 > Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > On Feb 17, 2011, at 3:44 PM, Jan Engelhardt wrote: > > > > > > > > Recent distributions start to have /etc/mtab being a symlink to > > > /proc/mounts with util-linux 2.19. Subsequently, this annoys umount.nfs4 > > > from nfs-client-1.2.3 and emits a warning: > > > > > > jng-0:/ # grep nfs4 /proc/mounts > > > 10.10.1.1:/home/ /home nfs4 rw,relatime,vers=4,rsize=1048576,wsize=1048576,namlen=255,hard,proto=tcp,port=0,timeo=600,retrans=2,sec=sys,clientaddr=10.10.1.212,minorversion=0,local_lock=none,addr=10.10.1.1 0 0 > > > jng-0:/ # umount /home > > > umount.nfs4: invalid value for 'port=' option > > > > I can take a look at this. > > > > FWIW, I just fixed mount.cifs recently based on recommendations from > Karel: > > http://git.samba.org/?p=cifs-utils.git;a=commitdiff;h=fba28cfe2f13dd8bdae3cec76178f42b001a40ca > > ...this is the same approach that /bin/mount uses, so you're probably > safe to use a similar one for mount/umount.nfs. This is not the same problem. The NFS umount/remount depends on (userspace) values from /etc/mtab. The solution is to link mount.nfs with libmount. I'm working on this change... http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-nfs/msg19165.html I have already talked about mtab issues at fedora-devel list, see http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2011-January/147995.html The mount.nfs and pam_mount are on my TODO list for the next weeks. If the changes in mount.nfs will be successful then I'd like to link mount.cifs with libmount too. Note that mount(8) in Fedora still supports regular mtab too, and the regular mtab is still util-linux upstream default. Karel -- Karel Zak <kzak@xxxxxxxxxx> http://karelzak.blogspot.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
