On Mon, 18 Oct 2010 15:48:11 +0100 ClÃudio Martins <ctpm@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Section D2 ends with: > > "The NFS version 4 protocol is stateful, and could actually support > delete-on-last-close. Unfortunately there isn't an easy way to do this > and remain backwards-compatible with version 2 and 3 accessors." > > So, theoretically, could one modify the code to selectively disable > silly rename on a client, when it knows it is talking v4 with the > server? > BTW, to clarify, I'm assuming a scenario where the server is configured to talk v4 only, which I suspect should be common, at least when you're relying on v4 kerberos security. Best regards ClÃudio -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
