On Wed, 13 Oct 2010 14:45:57 -0400 Steve Dickson <SteveD@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I would say send the UMNT, since it does not cause any pain to send it > verses the pain that could be cause by not sending it... > > This is a perfect example of fixing something that is not > broken... We can put our energy in better place that worrying > about things like this... IMHO... But it *is* broken. As Chuck pointed out, the main problem is that mtab handling is broken on remounts. That's a real problem that needs to be fixed. I agree that our time is better spent elsewhere. I just think that we ought to make that happen by eliminating the unnecessary umount helper. The less code that we need to maintain, the better... -- Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
