On 09/09/2010 01:03 PM, Chuck Lever wrote: > Hi Steve- > > On Sep 9, 2010, at 10:38 AM, Steve Dickson wrote: > >> >> On 09/02/2010 03:23 PM, Chuck Lever wrote: >>> Instead of a single function that can handle both AF_INET and AF_INET6 >>> addresses, two separate functions might be cleaner. >>> >>> The original plan was to keep code redundancy at a minimum, but the >>> resulting code was cumbersome at best. I think I've traded a little >>> extra code for something that will be much easier to read, understand, >>> and maintain. >>> >>> I've also eliminated the "#if / #endif" instances inside the functions. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@xxxxxxxxxx> >>> --- >> Committed... > > This (and the RDMA patches) appears in nfs-utils-exp.git, but not in nfs-utils.git. > > For my development tree, I pull from the latter. > Should I pull from nfs-utils-exp instead? Sorry about that, the patches now on the correct tree.. steved. > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
