Hi Steve- On Sep 9, 2010, at 10:38 AM, Steve Dickson wrote: > > On 09/02/2010 03:23 PM, Chuck Lever wrote: >> Instead of a single function that can handle both AF_INET and AF_INET6 >> addresses, two separate functions might be cleaner. >> >> The original plan was to keep code redundancy at a minimum, but the >> resulting code was cumbersome at best. I think I've traded a little >> extra code for something that will be much easier to read, understand, >> and maintain. >> >> I've also eliminated the "#if / #endif" instances inside the functions. >> >> Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@xxxxxxxxxx> >> --- > Committed... This (and the RDMA patches) appears in nfs-utils-exp.git, but not in nfs-utils.git. For my development tree, I pull from the latter. Should I pull from nfs-utils-exp instead? -- chuck[dot]lever[at]oracle[dot]com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
