On Wed, 2010-09-08 at 13:05 -0700, David Miller wrote: > From: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Wed, 08 Sep 2010 21:01:08 +0100 > > > In net-next-2.6, close() of a file after writing tends to return 1. > > This causes e.g. gcc to abort. > > > > This appears to have been fixed in 2.6.36-rc2: > > > > commit 0702099bd86c33c2dcdbd3963433a61f3f503901 > > Author: J. R. Okajima <hooanon05@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > Date: Wed Aug 11 13:10:16 2010 -0400 > > > > NFS: fix the return value of nfs_file_fsync() > > > > Please consider merging this fix in some way. > > Ben, and please I've told you this before, I don't think so. > if you need a specific > upstream fix do your testing on a branch that pulls in Linus's tree > or, alternatively, apply the fix you need by hand using "git stash" or > similar. [...] Sure, that's what I'm doing. But this is likely to hit more developers than just me. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings, Senior Software Engineer, Solarflare Communications Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job. They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html