Re: NFS writes broken in net-next-2.6

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 08 Sep 2010 21:01:08 +0100

> In net-next-2.6, close() of a file after writing tends to return 1.
> This causes e.g. gcc to abort.
> 
> This appears to have been fixed in 2.6.36-rc2:
> 
> commit 0702099bd86c33c2dcdbd3963433a61f3f503901
> Author: J. R. Okajima <hooanon05@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date:   Wed Aug 11 13:10:16 2010 -0400
> 
>     NFS: fix the return value of nfs_file_fsync()
> 
> Please consider merging this fix in some way.

Ben, and please I've told you this before, if you need a specific
upstream fix do your testing on a branch that pulls in Linus's tree
or, alternatively, apply the fix you need by hand using "git stash" or
similar.

All of this is in your own hands.  You do not need me to merge in
every single upstream fix you might need.

I have this issue myself when testing both the sparc tree and the
various net trees all the time.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Linux Media Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Info]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux