On Sep 3, 2010, at 12:15 PM, Ben Greear wrote: > A typo caused this method not not actually compare the > two addresses passed in. It returned true in almost all > cases instead. >From the perspective of the local logic, that looks correct. Have you tried this with IPv6 mounts? Notice any overall changes in behavior? > Signed-off-by: Ben Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > :100644 100644 4e7df2a... e734072... M fs/nfs/client.c > fs/nfs/client.c | 2 +- > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/nfs/client.c b/fs/nfs/client.c > index 4e7df2a..e734072 100644 > --- a/fs/nfs/client.c > +++ b/fs/nfs/client.c > @@ -275,7 +275,7 @@ static int nfs_sockaddr_match_ipaddr6(const struct sockaddr *sa1, > sin1->sin6_scope_id != sin2->sin6_scope_id) > return 0; > > - return ipv6_addr_equal(&sin1->sin6_addr, &sin1->sin6_addr); > + return ipv6_addr_equal(&sin1->sin6_addr, &sin2->sin6_addr); > } > #else /* !defined(CONFIG_IPV6) && !defined(CONFIG_IPV6_MODULE) */ > static int nfs_sockaddr_match_ipaddr6(const struct sockaddr *sa1, > -- > 1.6.2.5 > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- chuck[dot]lever[at]oracle[dot]com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
