I'm trying to redo my NFS RCU warning fixup patch on top of Paul's patches, and I've found a small potential bug: nfs_inode_reclaim_delegation() doesn't use the appropriate accessors/locks to protect NFS_I(inode)->delegation, and nor does it use such to protect *delegation that I can see. It just overwrites the record. Furthermore, for consistency's sake, it should also protect accesses to delegation->cred within that function. Trond: can you confirm that both NFS_I(inode)->delegation and delegation->cred should be considered RCU-protected pointers? David -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html