Le 19/01/2010 17:37, Chuck Lever a écrit : > As far as I understand it, "-l" means the kernel will do the local > detach from the system's file name space whenever there are no more > users (ie entirely asynchronously). I don't think umount2(MNT_DETACH) > indicates whether the kernel was able to completely unmount that file > system by the time the call returns, so there's perhaps no way for > umount.nfs to know whether it should send the UMNT request. If the > server is slow or unresponsive, that file system won't be unmounted > until long after the umount.nfs command has exited. > > This shouldn't be much of a big deal, since the server's rmtab is > "ornamental" according to the man page. No one should rely on it being > accurate. > > A possible way to fix this is to have the kernel send the UMNT. It makes sense, but it doesn't seem to trigger much interest :) Should I open a bug somewhere, to ensure the issue won't be forgotten ? -- BOFH excuse #196: Me no internet, only janitor, me just wax floors. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
