On Tue, Mar 09, 2010 at 09:55:52AM -0500, William A. (Andy) Adamson wrote: > On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 9:53 AM, J. Bruce Fields <bfields@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 09, 2010 at 09:46:04AM -0500, Andy Adamson wrote: > >> > >> RFC 5661 in section 18.51.3 > >> > >> Whenever a client establishes a new client ID and before it does the > >> first non-reclaim operation that obtains a lock, it MUST send a > >> RECLAIM_COMPLETE with rca_one_fs set to FALSE, even if there are no > >> locks to reclaim. If non-reclaim locking operations are done before > >> the RECLAIM_COMPLETE, an NFS4ERR_GRACE error will be returned. > >> > >> So there will never be a 'first OPEN' (except for an OPEN reclaim) > >> without a RECLAIM_COMPLETE. > > > > There will be in the case of an entirely new client, or a client that > > missed the grace period completely. > > No, the MUST above applies to both a new client/client that missed the > grace period completely. In both cases the client is establishing a > new client ID. Oog, sorry, obviously I can't read--I see what you mean now. I haven't seen any client send a RECLAIM_COMPLETE or any server demand one yet, so do we all have this wrong? Or was the above a mistake and they meant to say something like "whenever a client *that previously held state* establishes a new client ID...."? --b. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
