Re: reboot recovery

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Mar 09, 2010 at 09:46:04AM -0500, Andy Adamson wrote:
>
> On Mar 8, 2010, at 8:46 PM, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
>
>> The Linux server's reboot recovery code has long-standing  
>> architectural
>> problems, fails to adhere to the specifications in some cases, and  
>> does
>> not yet handle NFSv4.1 reboot recovery.  An overhaul has been a
>> long-standing todo.
>>
>> This is my attempt to state the problem and a rough solution.
>>
>> Requirements
>> ^^^^^^^^^^^^
>>
>> Requirements, as compared to current code:
>>
>> 	- Correctly implements the algorithm described in section 8.6.3
>> 	  of rfc 3530, and eliminates known race conditions on recovery.
>> 	- Does not attempt to manage files and directories directly from
>> 	  inside the kernel.
>> 	- Supports RECLAIM_COMPLETE.
>>
>> Requirements, in more detail:
>>
>> A "server instance" is the lifetime from start to shutdown of a  
>> server;
>> a reboot ends one server instance and starts another.  Normally a  
>> server
>> instance consists of a grace period followed by a period of normal
>> operation.  However, a server could go down before the grace period
>> completes.  Call a server instance that completes the grace period
>> "full", and one that does not "partial".
>>
>> Call a client "active" if it holds unexpired state on the server.   
>> Then:
>>
>> 	- An NFSv4.0 client becomes active as soon as it succesfully
>> 	  performs its first OPEN_CONFIRM, or its first reclaim OPEN.
>> 	- An NFSv4.1 client becomes active when it succesfully performs
>> 	  its first OPEN, or a RECLAIM_COMPLETE.
>
> RFC 5661 in section 18.51.3
>
>    Whenever a client establishes a new client ID and before it does the
>    first non-reclaim operation that obtains a lock, it MUST send a
>    RECLAIM_COMPLETE with rca_one_fs set to FALSE, even if there are no
>    locks to reclaim.  If non-reclaim locking operations are done before
>    the RECLAIM_COMPLETE, an NFS4ERR_GRACE error will be returned.
>
> So there will never be a 'first OPEN' (except for an OPEN reclaim)  
> without a RECLAIM_COMPLETE.

There will be in the case of an entirely new client, or a client that
missed the grace period completely.

(But I should have specified "first non-reclaim OPEN" in the 4.1 case,
not just "first OPEN".)

--b.

>
>
>> 	- Active clients become inactive when they expire.  (Or when
>> 	  they are revoked--but the Linux server does not currently
>> 	  support revocation.)
>> 	- On startup all clients are initially inactive.
>>
>> On startup the server needs access to the list of clients which are
>> permitted to reclaim state.  That list is exactly the list of clients
>> that were active at the end of the most recent full server instance.
>>
>> To maintain such a list, we need records to be stored in stable  
>> storage.
>> Whenever a client changes from inactive to active, or active to
>> inactive, stable storage must be updated, and until the update has
>> completed the server must do nothing that acknowledges the new state.
>> So:
>>
>> 	- When a new client becomes active, a record for that client
>> 	  must be created in stable storage before responding to the rpc
>> 	  in question (OPEN, OPEN_CONFIRM, or RECLAIM_COMPLETE).
>> 	- When a client expires, the record must be removed (or
>> 	  otherwise marked expired) before responding to any requests
>> 	  for locks or other state which would conflict with state held
>> 	  by the expiring client.
>>
>> Updates must be made by upcalls to userspace; the kernel will not be
>> directly involved in managing stable storage.  The upcall interface
>> should be extensible.
>>
>> The records must include the client owner name, to allow identifying
>> clients on restart.  The protocol allows client owner names to consist
>> of up to 1024 bytes of binary data.  (This is the client-supplied
>> long form, not the server-generated shorthand clientid; co_ownerid for
>> 4.1).
>>
>> Also desireable, but not absolutely required in the first
>> implementation:
>>
>> 	- We should not take the state lock while waiting for records to
>> 	  be stored.  (Doing so blocks all other stateful operations
>> 	  while we wait for disk.)
>> 	- The server should be able to end the grace period early when
>> 	  the list of clients allowed to reclaim is empty, or when they
>> 	  are all 4.1 clients, after all have sent RECLAIM_COMPLETE.
>> 	- Will allow pluggable methods for storage of reboot recovery
>> 	  records, as the NFSv2 and NFSv3 code currently does (in order
>> 	  to support high-availability).
>>
>> Possibly also desireable:
>>
>> 	- Record the principal that originally created the client, and
>> 	  whether it had EXCHGID4_FLAG_BIND_PRINC_STATEID (see rfc 5661
>> 	  section 8.4.2.1).
>>
>> Draft design
>> ^^^^^^^^^^^^
>>
>> We will modify rpc.statd to handle to manage state in userspace.
>>
>> Previous prototype code from CITI will be considered as a starting
>> point.
>>
>> Kernel<->user communication will use four files in the "nfsd"
>> filesystem.  All of them will use the encoding used for rpc cache
>> upcalls and downcalls, which consist of whitespace-separated fields
>> escaped as necessary to allow binary data.
>>
>> Three of them will be used for upcalls; statd reads request from them,
>> and writes responses back:
>>
>> create_client:
>> 	- given a client owner, returns an error.  Does not return until
>> 	  a new record has safely been recorded on disk.
>>
>> grace_done:
>> 	- request and reply are both empty; rpc.statd returns only after
>> 	  it has recorded to disk the fact that the grace period
>> 	  completed.
>>
>> expire_client:
>> 	- given a client owner, replies with an empty reply.  Replies
>> 	  only after it has recorded to disk the fact that the client
>> 	  has expired.
>>
>> One additional file will be used for a downcall:
>>
>> allow_client:
>> 	- before starting the server, statd will open this file, write a
>> 	  newline-separated list of client owners permitted to recover,
>> 	  then close the file.  If no clients are allowed to recover, it
>> 	  will still open and close the file.
>>
>> Statd will use the presence of these upcalls to determine whether the
>> server supports the new recovery mechanism.  nfsd may use rpc.statd's
>> open of allow_client to decide whether userspace supports the new
>> mechanism.  Thus allows a mismatched kernel and userspace to still
>> maintain reboot recovery records.
>>
>> In addition, we could support seamless reboot recovery across the
>> transition to the new system by making statd convert between on-disk
>> formats.  However, for simplicity's sake we plan for the server to be
>> refuse all reclaims on the first boot after the transition.
>>
>> By default, statd will store records as files in the directory
>> /var/lib/nfs/v4clients.  The file name will be a hash of the
>> client_owner, and the contents will consist of two newline-separated
>> fields:
>> 	- The client owner, encoded as in the upcall.
>> 	- A timestamp.
>>
>> More fields may be added in the future.
>>
>> Before starting the server, and writing to allow_client, statd will
>> manage boot times and old clients using files in /var/lib/nfs:
>>
>> 	If boot_time exists:
>> 		- It will be read, and the contents interpreted as an
>> 		  ascii-encoded unix time in seconds.
>> 		- All client records older than that time will be removed.
>> 		- The current boot_time will be recorded to
>> 		  new_boot_time (replacing any existing such file).
>> 		- All remaining clients will be written to allow_client.
>> 	If boot_time does not exist, an empty /var/lib/nfs/v4clients/ is
>> 		created if necessary, but nothing else is done.
>>
>> Statd will then wait for create_client, expire_client, and grace_done
>> calls.  On grace_done, it will rename boot_time to old_boot_time, and
>> new_boot_time to boot_time.
>>
>> --b.
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs"  
>> in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Linux Media Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Info]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux