From: Christian Kujau <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> There's currently an open Ubuntu bug[0], with the intent to compile NFS_FSCACHE (and possibly AFS_FSCACHE, 9P_FSCACHE) into the standard Ubuntu kernel. However, since *_FSCACHE still depends on EXPERIMENTAL, this won't happen. As Arjan van de Ven pointed out[1], the EXPERIMENTAL flag doesn't mean that much any more, I propose the following patch to fs/nfs/Kconfig. I'd do the same for fs/9p/Kconfig and fs/afs/Kconfig, but as I did not test 9p or AFS, I feel it would not be appropriate for me to remove the flag. [0] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/440522/comments/5 [1] http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/1/23/145 Signed-off-by: Christian Kujau <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx> --- fs/nfs/Kconfig | 3 +-- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/nfs/Kconfig b/fs/nfs/Kconfig index 59e5673..a43d07e 100644 --- a/fs/nfs/Kconfig +++ b/fs/nfs/Kconfig @@ -95,8 +95,7 @@ config ROOT_NFS Most people say N here. config NFS_FSCACHE - bool "Provide NFS client caching support (EXPERIMENTAL)" - depends on EXPERIMENTAL + bool "Provide NFS client caching support" depends on NFS_FS=m && FSCACHE || NFS_FS=y && FSCACHE=y help Say Y here if you want NFS data to be cached locally on disc through -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
