Re: [PATCH 0/3] nfs-utils: add testing infrastructure to nfs-utils (try #3)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Jan 6, 2010, at 2:58 PM, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
On Wed, Jan 06, 2010 at 02:42:47PM -0500, Jeff Layton wrote:
On Wed, 6 Jan 2010 14:17:06 -0500
"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

This probably just shows I'm not reading carefully, but: are you
requiring root, and messing with their existing nfs configuration at
all?

For the export stuff it would also be great to have some tests that set up a few dummy exports (using tmpfs?) and tried to mount them (just over loopback), but I'd be afraid someone would try to run "make check" on
their production server.  So I'm not sure where to put that kind of
test.


The script I have so far doesn't check for root privs, but it won't
work unless you have them since statd will fail to start. statd
currently requires root privs to start though it does drop them soon
afterward.

I'm open to suggestions on changing this as I'm not crazy about that
either.

My feeling is that it will be hard to find a realistic way to test
everything without having root and taking over the machine to some
degree.

Just so long as the user understands whether it needs to be run as root, whether it's safe to be run on a host connected to the network, etc....
I don't know if 'make check' is the right ui for that.

I hear your concern. I would have some trepidation about using "make check" if I knew it required root, and was not familiar enough with the code to know exactly what it does.

My original idea was that this facility would be a set of smaller unit tests. Since some of statd/sm-notify is now broken out into libraries, I think that makes it a little easier to craft targeted tests that don't require a full-blown statd running to carry out (Of course, that's speculation; I could be wrong, and Jeff has kindly set up the code for us to test this theory!).

The old code has a statd simulator that doesn't require root, and uses its own RPC program number. It might be reasonable to adopt that approach instead of using the real statd, for some test cases.

Another way to set this up might be to use a container, or run it under a lightweight kvm.

--
Chuck Lever
chuck[dot]lever[at]oracle[dot]com



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Linux Media Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Info]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux