On Sat, Sep 07, 2024 at 04:09:33PM +0000, Chuck Lever III wrote: > > > On Sep 7, 2024, at 11:17 AM, Mike Snitzer <snitzer@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Rather than have general concern for LOCALIO doing something wrong, > > we'd do well to make sure there is proper test coverage for required > > shutdown sequences (completely indepent of LOCALIO, maybe that already > > exists?). > > That is on the to-do list for the NFSD kdevops CI infrastructure, > but unfortunately implementation has not been started yet. Could be a good project for me to help with. I'm on the fence between kdevops and ktest, ideally I could come up with something that'd easily hook into both test harnesses. Supporting both would be simple if the new tests were added to a popular testsuite that both can run (e.g. xfstests, or any other separate nfs/nfsd testsuite you may have?). Or is "NFSD kdevops CI" itself what your tests be engineered with? I can contribute anywhere, would just like to kill multiple birds when doing so. Thanks, Mike
