在 2024/8/23 20:07, Jeff Layton 写道:
On Fri, 2024-08-23 at 15:00 +0800, Li Lingfeng wrote:
Fix spelling errors in comments of nfsd4_release_lockowner and
nfs4_set_delegation.
Signed-off-by: Li Lingfeng <lilingfeng3@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
index a20c2c9d7d45..66a0c76850f3 100644
--- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
+++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
@@ -5856,7 +5856,7 @@ nfs4_set_delegation(struct nfsd4_open *open, struct nfs4_ol_stateid *stp,
/*
* Now that the deleg is set, check again to ensure that nothing
- * raced in and changed the mode while we weren't lookng.
+ * raced in and changed the mode while we weren't looking.
*/
status = nfsd4_verify_setuid_write(open, fp->fi_deleg_file);
if (status)
@@ -8335,7 +8335,7 @@ check_for_locks(struct nfs4_file *fp, struct nfs4_lockowner *lowner)
* @cstate: NFSv4 COMPOUND state
* @u: RELEASE_LOCKOWNER arguments
*
- * Check if theree are any locks still held and if not - free the lockowner
+ * Check if there are any locks still held and if not - free the lockowner
This is probably better grammatically:
Check if there are any locks still held and if not, free the lockowner
Thanks for your advice, it does look better.
* and any lock state that is owned.
*
* Return values:
