Thank you for your response. I appreciate you taking the time to address
my concerns. Moving forward, I will be more mindful and refrain from
submitting patches like this.
在 2024/8/23 20:08, Jeff Layton 写道:
On Fri, 2024-08-23 at 15:00 +0800, Li Lingfeng wrote:
Just remove the redundant blank line in do_open_permission. No function
change.
Signed-off-by: Li Lingfeng <lilingfeng3@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c
index 2e39cf2e502a..0068db924060 100644
--- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c
+++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c
@@ -141,7 +141,6 @@ fh_dup2(struct svc_fh *dst, struct svc_fh *src)
static __be32
do_open_permission(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct svc_fh *current_fh, struct nfsd4_open *open, int accmode)
{
-
if (open->op_truncate &&
!(open->op_share_access & NFS4_SHARE_ACCESS_WRITE))
return nfserr_inval;
NACK. In general, we don't take whitespace patches. They just make
backporting harder later if you have to do it. If you have a material
change to make in this area, then go ahead and fix the whitespace, but
otherwise don't bother.
