On 12/03/2009 08:26 PM, Boaz Harrosh wrote: > > Hi Bruce > > I'm reposting the all set together > > There are two patches that people have said will go through > other trees (see below). So either wait with patch 12/12 after > they get into Linus. Or also submit them through nfsd, it should > not cause any problems to post the same patch from two sub-trees, > right? > > (For the things done here please let it sit in linux-next for > a couple of nights) > Bruce, these are based on for-2.6.33 branch from your tree but I just realize that your "-next" branch is more advanced Must I rebase? (But only Sunday it's getting late down here) Boaz > [PATCH 01/12] nfsd: Remove nfsfh.h dependency on sunrpc > [PATCH 02/12] sunrpc: Clean never used include files > [PATCH 03/12] nfsd: Fix independence of a few nfsd related headers > [PATCH 04/12] nfsd: Headers Independence and include cleanups > [PATCH 05/12] nfsd: Source files #include cleanups > > First batch > > [PATCH 06/12] compat.c: Remove dependence on nfsd private headers > [PATCH 07/12] parsic: remove un-used nfsd #includes > > This patch we have ACK on > > [PATCH 08/12] sparc: remove un-used nfsd #includes > [PATCH 09/12] s390: remove un-used nfsd #includes > > These two were reported as submitted into ARCH tree for 2.6.33 > > [PATCH 10/12] lockd: Remove un-used nfsd headers #includes > [PATCH 11/12] vfs: nfsctl.c un-used nfsd #includes > > [PATCH 12/12] nfsd: Move private headers to source directory > > this patch is the only one that depends on all > the other parts, and need all patches in. > (And will cause Benny's tree to adjust) > > Thanks > Boaz > > _______________________________________________ > pNFS mailing list > pNFS@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://linux-nfs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pnfs -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
