Hi Bruce I'm reposting the all set together There are two patches that people have said will go through other trees (see below). So either wait with patch 12/12 after they get into Linus. Or also submit them through nfsd, it should not cause any problems to post the same patch from two sub-trees, right? (For the things done here please let it sit in linux-next for a couple of nights) [PATCH 01/12] nfsd: Remove nfsfh.h dependency on sunrpc [PATCH 02/12] sunrpc: Clean never used include files [PATCH 03/12] nfsd: Fix independence of a few nfsd related headers [PATCH 04/12] nfsd: Headers Independence and include cleanups [PATCH 05/12] nfsd: Source files #include cleanups First batch [PATCH 06/12] compat.c: Remove dependence on nfsd private headers [PATCH 07/12] parsic: remove un-used nfsd #includes This patch we have ACK on [PATCH 08/12] sparc: remove un-used nfsd #includes [PATCH 09/12] s390: remove un-used nfsd #includes These two were reported as submitted into ARCH tree for 2.6.33 [PATCH 10/12] lockd: Remove un-used nfsd headers #includes [PATCH 11/12] vfs: nfsctl.c un-used nfsd #includes [PATCH 12/12] nfsd: Move private headers to source directory this patch is the only one that depends on all the other parts, and need all patches in. (And will cause Benny's tree to adjust) Thanks Boaz -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
