On Fri, Mar 01, 2024 at 11:07:36AM +1100, NeilBrown wrote: > This series is intended to replace > 98be4be88369 nfsd: drop st_mutex and rp_mutex before calling move_to_close_lru() > in nfsd-next. Hi Neil, I will drop that patch from nfsd-next now. > As Jeff Layton oberved recently there is a problem with that patch. > This series takes a different approach to the rp_mutex proble, replacing it with an > atomic_t which has three states. Details in the patch. > > Thnaks, > NeilBrown > > > [PATCH 1/3] nfsd: move nfsd4_cstate_assign_replay() earlier in open > [PATCH 2/3] nfsd: replace rp_mutex to avoid deadlock in > [PATCH 3/3] nfsd: drop st_mutex_mutex before calling -- Chuck Lever
