Some arch files had unneeded #includes directives from linux/nfsd/*. Some vfs files had unneeded #includes directives from linux/nfsd/*. In an effort to move some of the now public nfsd headers to the source directory, submitted a cleanup. I have cross compiled sparc64 and s390, parsic needs testing. Please ARCH people sends ACKs, or take these patches through your trees. patches: [PATCH 1/5] parsic: remove unused nfsd #includes Some kind soul, please compile with this patch? compile is all that's needed. [PATCH 2/5] sparc: remove unused nfsd #includes [PATCH 3/5] s390: remove unused nfsd #includes These two were cross compiled. Should we submit them through nfsd tree or the ARCH trees? [PATCH 4/5] vfs: nfsctl.c unused nfsd #includes [PATCH 5/5] lockd: Remove unused nfsd headers #includes Can these patches go through the nfsd tree? Who's ACKs should we collect? Andrew? Bruce Hi With this set applied, the only nfsd files used publicly are: const.h export.h nfsfh.h stats.h syscall.h These files can be moved to source folder: cache.h debug.h nfsd.h state.h xdr3.h xdr4.h xdr.h Why is debug.h exported from Kernel? (include/linux/nfsd/Kbuild) So just to see how this move might look like see last patch: [RFC] nfsd: Move private headers to source directory This patch was compiled, as well, on x86(32/64), sparc64, s390 Thanks Boaz -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
