Re: [PATCH 6/6] configure: check for rpc_gss_seccreate

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 12/8/23 9:26 AM, Olga Kornievskaia wrote:
On Thu, Dec 7, 2023 at 5:27 PM Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Thu, Dec 07, 2023 at 05:21:50PM -0500, Olga Kornievskaia wrote:
On Thu, Dec 7, 2023 at 9:44 AM Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Wed, Dec 06, 2023 at 04:33:32PM -0500, Olga Kornievskaia wrote:
From: Olga Kornievskaia <kolga@xxxxxxxxxx>

If we have rpc_gss_sccreate in tirpc library define
HAVE_TIRPC_GSS_SECCREATE, which would allow us to handle bad_integrity
errors.

Signed-off-by: Olga Kornievskaia <kolga@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
  aclocal/libtirpc.m4 | 5 +++++
  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)

diff --git a/aclocal/libtirpc.m4 b/aclocal/libtirpc.m4
index bddae022..ef48a2ae 100644
--- a/aclocal/libtirpc.m4
+++ b/aclocal/libtirpc.m4
@@ -26,6 +26,11 @@ AC_DEFUN([AC_LIBTIRPC], [
                                      [Define to 1 if your tirpc library provides libtirpc_set_debug])],,
                           [${LIBS}])])

+     AS_IF([test -n "${LIBTIRPC}"],
+           [AC_CHECK_LIB([tirpc], [rpc_gss_seccreate],
+                         [AC_DEFINE([HAVE_TIRPC_GSS_SECCREATE], [1],
+                                    [Define to 1 if your tirpc library provides rpc_gss_seccreate])],,
+                         [${LIBS}])])
    AC_SUBST([AM_CPPFLAGS])
    AC_SUBST(LIBTIRPC)

It would be better for distributors if this checked that the local
version of libtirpc has the rpc_gss_seccreate fix that you sent.
The PKG_CHECK_MODULES macro should work for that, once you know the
version number of libtirpc that will have that fix.

Also, this patch should come either before "gssd: switch to using
rpc_gss_seccreate()" or this change should be squashed into that
patch, IMO.

I can certainly re-arrange the order (if Steve wants me to re-send an
ordered list).  I attempted to address your comment to  check for
existence of the function or fallback to the old way.

A comment that I made when I thought no changes to rpc_gss_seccreate(3t)
would be needed.... But you found and fixed a bug there.


I'm not sure I'm
capable of producing something that depends on distro versioning (or
am I supposed to be)?

I think this series truly needs to check the libtirpc version.
Otherwise the build will complete successfully, gssd will use
rpc_gss_seccreate(), but it will be broken.

Grep for PKG_CHECK_MODULES in the other files in aclocal/ and you
should find a pattern to use.

Yes but I won't know the version number of libtirpc (version or rpm
package) for which to check? It seems like libtirpc changes needs to
be checked in (btw I'm assuming a new version would need to be
generated), then (if that's it or libtirpc version and package version
are different things there might be more) this particular patch could
be generated. Isn't that correct?

Steve, I could really use your guidance on steps to be done here.
Again... The versions "on who is on first and what is on second" :-)
Is not an upstream problem... It is a distro problem...

Let me take a closer look...


Thank you.



I think this goes back to me hoping that a
distro would create matching set of libtirpc and nfs-utils rpms...
We do... upstream creates tar balls... distros create rpm
that have requirements for certain versions of things.

steved.


IME distros don't work that way.


--
Chuck Lever






[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Linux Media Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Info]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux