Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 14546] New: Off-by-two stack buffer overflow in function rpc_uaddr2sockaddr() of net/sunrpc/addr.c

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Nov 10, 2009, at 6:29 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:

(switched to email. Please respond via emailed reply-to-all, not via the
bugzilla web interface).

On Thu, 5 Nov 2009 10:31:03 GMT
bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14546

          Summary: Off-by-two stack buffer overflow in function
                   rpc_uaddr2sockaddr() of net/sunrpc/addr.c
          Product: Networking
          Version: 2.5
   Kernel Version: 2.6.32-rc6
         Platform: All
       OS/Version: Linux
             Tree: Mainline
           Status: NEW
         Severity: normal
         Priority: P1
        Component: Other
       AssignedTo: acme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
       ReportedBy: argp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
               CC: argp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
       Regression: No


There is an off-by-two stack buffer overflow in function rpc_uaddr2sockaddr()
of file net/sunrpc/addr.c in the Linux kernel SUNRPC implementation.

The function rpc_uaddr2sockaddr() that is used to convert a universal address to a socket address takes as an argument the size_t variable uaddr_len (the length of the universal address string). The stack buffer buf is declared in line 315 to be of size RPCBIND_MAXUADDRLEN. If the passed argument uaddr_len is equal to RPCBIND_MAXUADDRLEN then the check at line 319 passes and then at
lines 324 and 325 there are two out-of-bounds assignments:

   319         if (uaddr_len > sizeof(buf))
   320                 return 0;
...
   324         buf[uaddr_len] = '\n';
   325         buf[uaddr_len + 1] = '\0';

To fix it please see the attached patch.


Please don't submit patches via bugzilla.

Please prepare this patch as per Documentation/SubmittingPatches and
email it to all the recipients of this email, thanks.

--- ./net/sunrpc/addr.c.orig	2009-11-05 11:55:45.000000000 +0200
+++ ./net/sunrpc/addr.c	2009-11-05 12:09:34.000000000 +0200
@@ -316,7 +316,7 @@
	unsigned long portlo, porthi;
	unsigned short port;

-	if (uaddr_len > sizeof(buf))
+	if (uaddr_len > sizeof(buf) - 2)
		return 0;

Why wouldn't you bump the size of the buffer by two as well? Otherwise valid universal addresses that are RPCBIND_MAXUADDRLEN bytes long will fail here.

	memcpy(buf, uaddr, uaddr_len);

--
Chuck Lever
chuck[dot]lever[at]oracle[dot]com



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Linux Media Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Info]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux